New England Review

  • Current Issue
  • Back Issues
    • Vol. 40, No. 2 (2019)
    • Vol. 40, No 1 (2019)
    • Vol. 39 (2018)
      • Vol. 39, No. 4 (2018)
      • Vol. 39, No. 3 (2018)
      • Vol. 39, No. 2 (2018)
      • Vol. 39, No. 1 (2018)
    • Vol. 38 (2017)
      • Vol. 38, No. 4 (2017)
      • Vol. 38, No. 3 (2017)
      • Vol.38, No. 2 (2017)
      • Vol. 38, No. 1 (2017)
    • Vol. 37 (2016)
      • Vol. 37, No. 4 (2016)
      • Vol. 37, No. 3 (2016)
      • Vol. 37, No. 2 (2016)
      • Vol. 37, No. 1 (2016)
    • Vol. 36 (2015)
      • Vol. 36, No. 4 (2015)
      • Vol. 36, No. 3 (2015)
      • Vol. 36, No. 2 (2015)
      • Vol. 36, No. 1 (2015)
    • Vol. 35 (2014-2015)
      • Vol. 35, No.1 (2014)
      • Vol. 35, No. 2 (2014)
      • Vol. 35, No. 3 (2014)
      • Vol. 35, No. 4 (2015)
    • Vol. 34 (2013-2014)
      • Vol. 34, No. 1 (2013)
      • Vol. 34, No. 2 (2013)
      • Vol. 34, Nos. 3-4 (2014)
    • Vol. 33 (2012-2013)
      • Vol. 33, No. 1 (2012)
      • Vol. 33, No. 2 (2012)
      • Vol. 33, No. 3 (2012)
      • Vol. 33, No. 4 (2013)
    • Vol. 32 (2011-2012)
      • Vol. 32, No. 1 (2011)
      • Vol. 32, No. 2 (2011)
      • Vol. 32, No. 3 (2011)
      • Vol. 32, No. 4 (2012)
    • Vol. 31 (2010)
      • Vol. 31, No. 1 (2010)
      • Vol. 31, No. 2 (2010)
      • Vol. 31, No. 3 (2010)
      • Vol. 31, No. 4 (2010-2011)
    • Vol. 30 (2009)
      • Vol. 30, No. 1 (2009)
      • Vol. 30, No. 2 (2009)
      • Vol. 30, No. 3 (2009)
      • Vol. 30, No. 4 (2009-2010)
    • Vol. 29 (2008)
      • Vol. 29, No. 1 (2008)
      • Vol. 29, No. 2 (2008)
      • Vol. 29, No. 3 (2008)
      • Vol. 29, No. 4 (2008)
    • Vol. 28 (2007)
      • Vol. 28, No. 1 (2007)
      • Vol. 28, No. 2 (2007)
      • Vol. 28, No. 3 (2007)
      • Vol. 28, No. 4 (2007)
    • Vol. 27 (2006)
      • Vol. 27, No. 1 (2006)
      • Vol. 27, No. 2 (2006)
      • Vol. 27, No. 3 (2006)
      • Vol. 27, No. 4 (2006)
    • Vol. 26 (2005)
      • Vol. 26, No. 1 (2005)
      • Vol. 26, No. 2 (2005)
      • Vol. 26, No. 3 (2005)
      • Vol. 26, No. 4 (2005)
    • Vol. 25 (2004)
      • Vol. 25, Nos. 1-2 (2004)
      • Vol. 25, No. 3 (2004)
      • Vol. 25, No. 4 (2004)
    • Vol. 24 (2003)
      • Vol. 24, No. 1 (2003)
      • Vol. 24, No. 2 (2003)
      • Vol. 24, No. 3 (2003)
      • Vol. 24, No. 4 (2004)
        • See all
  • Events
  • Subscribe/Order
  • About
    • Masthead
    • NER Award Winners
    • The Podcast
    • Press
    • Award for Emerging Writers
    • Readers and Interns
    • Contact
  • Submit

Middlebury Contributors to Sight & Sound’s Greatest Films Poll

September 16, 2012

This summer, movie-lovers everywhere were buzzing about the fact that Citizen Kane had been dethroned by Vertigo as “The Greatest Film of All Time,” at least according to The 2012 Greatest Films Poll at Sight & Sound magazine.

Starting in 1952, the publication has contacted the most influential artists and critical voices in film, and polled them, once per decade, for their personal top ten list of movies. This year, I am pleased to report on two critics – one at Middlebury College and one at NER – who were asked to contribute ballots.

Both of these writers discovered novel ways to make their individual lists stand out from the pack with fresh and relevant picks. Middlebury College Professor of Film and Media Culture Christian Keathley submitted his choices, as did writer J.M. Tyree, a member of NER’s Editorial Panel and a Middlebury alum.

Keathley rounded up many of the usual suspects in terms of directors, like Bresson, Renoir, and Hitchcock. However, when it came to specific movies, he zeroed in on some unconventional choices. For instance, he opted for Ford’s little-known They Were Expendable instead of what many consider his magnum opus, The Searchers. Rather than cast a vote for Godard’s Breathless or Contempt, Keathley’s list gave the nod to the director’s arguably more complex and far less bombastic Vivre Sa Vie.

While works of humor were scarce on the collective Sight & Sound top fifty, Keathley paid tribute to a few works with a lighter touch, like Powell and Pressburger’s sparkling romance I Know Where I’m Going! and Sturges’s uproarious The Lady Eve. Fortunately so, because with three Tarkovsky films on the final fifty, I was beginning to wonder if critics can still laugh.

Tyree injected playfulness and variety into his list by limiting himself to one film from each decade from the 1920s to the 2000s, from Flaherty’s landmark Nanook of the North to Lixin Fan’s Last Train Home. His list also puts a firm emphasis on documentary, a genre too often overlooked in these kinds of ranked lists. Tyree also recognized that his movie picks reflect a common theme: “journeys of various kinds that connect the personal and the historical, the national and the global, with an increasing lack of triumphalism.”

Tyree’s balanced list also offers up some of the most poignant films of all time, including David Lean’s splendidly ordinary Brief Encounter and Ozu’s Tokyo Story, while not neglecting a fast-paced comedy-thriller like The Lady Vanishes.

In closing, I’d like to congratulate these respected critics in our midst, not only for the honor of being chosen, but also for submitting fun, stimulating lists! In light of their creative ballots, I will forgive them both for the colossal oversight of Ernst Lubitsch’s Trouble in Paradise. They only had ten slots, after all…

Be sure to read the critics’ full lists at Sight & Sound’s Greatest Films Poll website.

Read Keathley’s Top 10 | Read Tyree’s Top 10

So, what movies are on your list? Leave a Comment with a few must-see titles…

Filed Under: NER Community Tagged With: BFI, Bresson, Flaherty, Ford, Godard, Hitchcock, Keathley, Lean, Lixin Fan, Ozu, Powell and Pressburger, Renoir, Sight & Sound, Sturges, Tyree

Volume 40, Number 3
Cover art by Anna Dibble

Subscribe

CONFLUENCES

Beach Reading

Leath Tonino

Beach Reading

Mind, text, wilderness—I’ve long been fascinated by their interactions. Specifically, I’ve been fascinated by what happens when we lug books into nature, when we situate our reading within a context of more-than-human energies, when we rest the butt on a barnacled rock or driftwood bench and fill the brain to brimming: sentences, crying birds, definitions, slanting light.

ner via email

Stories, poems, essays, and web features delivered to your Inbox.

quarterly newsletter

Click here to sign up for quarterly updates.

categories

Navigation

  • Subscribe/Order
  • Back Issues
  • About NER
  • Events
  • Audio
  • NER Out Loud
  • Emerging Writers Award
  • Support NER
  • Advertising Information

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Copyright © 2019 · facebook · twitter